NeedRadar turns scattered tasks, friction, and workarounds from public discussions into opportunity briefs with original evidence, provenance, counterevidence, and explicit validation boundaries.
V2 means a compatible workflow problem appears in repeated independent public observations. It does not prove customer confirmation, real-task use, sustained adoption, or product-market fit.
Review independent observations, source diversity, editorial judgment, and counterevidence before deciding whether to interview or build.
Five accessible, PII-free observations form one repeated signal across two source policies and five independent author groups. The system published the brief only after evidence-completeness and similarity gates passed.
Seventy-eight accessible, PII-free observations form one repeated signal across two source policies and 57 independent author groups. Publication followed evidence-completeness and similarity checks.
8 accessible observations form an emerging workflow signal across 2 source policies. English editorial review is pending for this newly published brief.
NeedRadar never turns one post, one rule, or one composite score into a “validated market opportunity.” Public pages keep four evidence layers separate and preserve counterevidence, missing information, and stale status.
Accessible public expression, date, minimal excerpt, and capture hash
A common task repeated across independent authors or sources
Mechanism, dependencies, failure modes, and human gates
Confirmation, completed action, delivered prototype, real tasks, and sustained use
Submit a public link and the minimum useful context. Scheduled approved sources pass evidence and similarity gates; user-submitted links remain exception signals that are checked separately and never auto-contact the author.